Plugged in Movie Reviews Extremely Wicked Shockingly Evil
first-class performance by Zac Efron
Equally many others accept stated, this isn't a film about Ted Bundy on i of his murdering sprees. This is well-nigh Bundy himself and how he made his way in the world. Someone said at 1 bespeak they found themselves rooting for him. I never did, simply that'due south because at my age, it's difficult to fool me after all the phonies I've met.
Some people volition exist disappointed because we didn't get to run into all the horror he visited on women, simply it was a refreshing change of accent hither.
To meet the young women salivating over him in the courtroom, cheering him on, was both shocking and expected. Real footage was used. I think women doing that over the Menendez brothers. Part of it is the quondam takeoff on a Geraldo Testify - "Men in Prison and the Women Who Honey Them," a phenomenon that happens time and fourth dimension over again. With Bundy, because he was particularly proficient-looking, it was an even stronger reaction.
Zac Efron is a favorite of mine -he resembles my favorite classic pic star, Tyrone Power, and I thought he captured the charm and personality of a whack task actually well. Lily Collins is terrific equally his girlfriend. Both of these actors are growing into exceptional performers.
In the cease "Extremely Wicked" makes a deplorable statement. Practiced looks. confidence, and charm will bring you a long style in this globe. We've seen it also often. It's fourth dimension to start looking at people'south souls. The external is, after all, only that.
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
If yous accept it every bit an exclusively functioning-based movie, and then you will bask information technology
Warning: Spoilers
"Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil, and Vile" has been inspired by the atrocious murders committed past Ted Bundy. The director Joe Berlinger has chosen a different mode to tell viewers the charismatic murderer's story. Maybe all the viewers may non like his style of storytelling, merely I am one of those rare viewers who loved and enjoyed it.
The primary reason I enjoyed information technology so much is considering the managing director has not followed the and so-called norms and rules of a clichéd serial killer movie ; for instance, showing all the murders in wearisome-paced and total details, repetitively confirming the fact that a particular character is actually a sociopath by presenting 8 or nine scenes of him/her in fits of violent anger, and so on . Instead, Mr. Berlinger has decided to show us how intelligent, charismatic, innocent-looking, and convincing a serial killer can be in real life.
The kickoff half of the movie is conveyed through the perspective of Liz Kloepfer (Lily Collins), who was the girlfriend of Bundy. The second half is mostly based on the trials / courtroom sessions of Ted Bundy (played past Zac Efron). I would like to mention the fact that Zac Efron has given a brilliant, powerful, mannerly, and darkly captivating functioning as the serial killer Ted Bundy.
Zac Efron's performance is the greatest highlight of this picture. He presents the killer'due south intelligent act of playing innocent so brilliantly. Other outstanding performances are that of Lily Collins, who plays his longtime girlfriend Liz, and John Malkovich equally the sharp-tongued judge. This is a operation-based movie, and if you want to run across bully performances by good actors, then watch this ane and ignore the negative comments that some people will brand about flaws with the story, screenplay, and other excusable and unnecessary mentions of small errors here and there.
436 out of 521 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A nauseous human with two faces
Even if the principal particularity of Ted Bundy is indisputably a disconcerting want for exceptionally barbaric murders, the flick focuses on an unusual seduction power thanks to a charismatic eloquence and an extraordinary IQ, and then two women who loved him, Liz Kendall and Carole Anne Boone. Indeed, the film does not really deal with the police investigation and modestly eludes the macabre scenes of crimes, but, on the opposite, it highlights the duality of the monster: an odd mix of a successful womanizer and an accomplished serial killer, of Casanova and Jack the ripper, or an unexpected materialization of Harvey Dent, aka Two-Face, the fictional super-villain appearing in comic books published by DC, a criminal obsessed with duality and the conflict between expert and evil.
Thus, although Ted Bundy appears or seems 'lovable' in some of the first scenes, the movie depicts the states, during the 2d half, a pathetic seducer of any individual within his tiny environment (the journalists, the jurors, the gauge, the audience, ...), able to arrogantly smile like a politico during an ballot campaign, and devoid of any respect for the victims. This guy will literally sent chills up your spine. The motion picture sadly ends with an exhaustive list of known victims, and as many bruised families.
Cracking cast, especially Zac Efron unjustly cataloged with movies for decerebrated teenage girls, and excellently supported by Lily Collins, Kaya Scodelario, Angela Sarafyan. The atmosphere of the 70s is faithfully transcribed, with a neat photography. At concluding, it's quite unique to discover a serial killer through the optics of a adult female who truly loved him and was absolutely not aware of his nighttime side until the media coverage of the murders.
139 out of 173 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dont watch the Ted Bundy tapes before.
I beloved the bandage but I think if you want to scout the motion-picture show dont scout the Ted Bundy tapes 1st. Watch them after and then you will like the movie. Equally I believe it is told mostly from Elizabeth's point of view. I saw the tapes showtime then the movie. So I kept scrutinizing the whole time or waiting to see scenes that didnt come here.
Otherwise groovy piece of work . Zack and Lilly were slap-up every bit usual.
296 out of 350 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An interesting arroyo to the story, but the tone is poorly managed
Directed by Joe Berlinger immediately after completing work on Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes (2019), Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile is worth seeing for Zac Efron'southward performance, simply is a strangely muted matter, neither ghoulish warts-and-all carnage nor restrained psychological treatise. Telling the story of Ted Bundy from the perspective of a woman who was oblivious to his true nature is an interesting narrative choice, and had Berlinger stuck to this format, it could have made for a fascinating film. Withal, the longer it goes on, the more it seems to revel in Bundy's flamboyance, and what begins as an intriguing insider'southward wait at living with a killer soon shifts into an underwhelming courtroom drama, only returning to its original tone in the terminal (fictional) scene.
The movie begins in 1969, the night Bundy (Efron) and nm10616856 (Lily Collins) first met in a Seattle bar. As a single female parent with a depression-paying chore, she is surprised to find this charismatic, handsome, and intelligent law student so interested in her, just interested he is, with the duo chop-chop falling in love. Notwithstanding, 6 years later, when he is stopped in Utah for a minor traffic violation, the police notice ropes, handcuffs, ski mask, leather gloves, and a crowbar in his car, and he is after charged with and bedevilled of attempted kidnapping. He vehemently protests his innocence to Liz, and although concerned, she accepts his explanations. Nevertheless, as police force departments across California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Utah, Colorado, and Florida start to connect him to a string of contempo murders, information technology becomes harder and harder for Liz to deny there's more than to her boyfriend than she ever imagined.
Very loosely based on Liz Kloepfer'south memoir, The Phantom Prince: My Life With Ted Bundy (1981), Extremely Wicked was written by Michael Werwie. The hook for the original script was that the audience is unaware the character is Bundy; the film was written as a supposedly fictional story of a young couple whose life is shattered when he is accused of multiple murders, with his real identity only coming as a last human action twist. Equally Berlinger was completing The Ted Bundy Tapes, the script was offered to him, and although he found the twist distasteful, he loved the thought of looking at the Bundy story through the eyes of someone who thought him to be innocent.
One of the biggest appeals of the movie, of class, is the unexpected casting of Zac Efron as Bundy (Efron as well serves as executive producer). And it has to exist said, he's first-class. Although he doesn't really look like Bundy, he has the mannerisms down to a tee. Peculiarly if you watch the film later on the docu-series, you'll really selection up on the depth of the performance; Efron's every movement and gesture, the way he smiles, the way he stands, the tone of his voice, everything is perfect. Of class, Bundy'due south good looks and charisma were his most formidable weapons as he proved that evil could fester under an attractive façade, and this gives Efron room to manoeuvre, playing every scene in such a way that the subtext is e'er apparent, although never allowing Bundy's mask to sideslip. Indeed, it's the absence of any obvious monstrousness in the performance which is then unnerving.
One of the film's most notable components is that, autonomously from one brief scene near the end, in that location is no delineation of violence. As Liz's story, the idea is to present Bundy not with the 20/20 retrospect of history, just with the same caste of ambiguity with which she would have viewed him. Information technology'south an interesting way into the story and seems a genuine attempt to do something more than simply reproduce the salacious details of the crimes. Of course, if you're making a film near a serial killer which doesn't feature much in the way of serial killing, you're going to need to fill up it with something, and in this sense, Berlinger focuses, at to the lowest degree in the first half, on how a killer can prevarication and manipulate, coming across every bit completely normal to all who know him. Berlinger has said that the picture show is about the mechanics of how a person tin can be "seduced by someone capable of evil", and it was his intention that the audience actually similar Bundy, every bit he wanted them to feel cloy with themselves - just similar Liz, he wanted them to exist seduced by evil.
Still, every bit admirable every bit this approach is, the flick has a lot of problems. For 1 thing, because information technology depicts Bundy not every bit we now know him but every bit his contemporaries saw him, it means we simply run across the performative side, never the monstrous underbelly. Sure, this means that the film avoids exploitation, just in doing and so, information technology could be accused of sanitisation (to be fair, this is something of a damned if you lot exercise, damned if you don't scenario - show the murders and y'all're exploiting real-life suffering, don't prove them and you lot're hiding the truthful nature of his crimes). And granted, portraying him as a perhaps innocent human being is part of the try to explain how Liz could be duped, but all the skilful intentions in the world don't change the fact that the film's Bundy is a lovable rogue who bites his thumb at the arrangement, not a murderer, a homo who raped and butchered a 12-year-onetime child, and who decapitated multiple women and had sex with their corpses.
I understand that Berlinger wants to draw how Liz could have been blinded by devotion to a man that she thought (correctly, every bit information technology turned out) was too good to be truthful. But the problem is that she herself is never characterised enough for this to work; everything we learn about her is predicated on her relationship with him - there's nothing about her life prior to meeting him, and what we learn about her life later on he was convicted is primarily fictional. Additionally, the focus shift halfway through as the motion picture transitions from Liz as subjective focaliser to a more considerately focalised court drama makes very little tonal sense. It's almost as if Berlinger loses interest in Liz when the sensationalist trial begins. This transition reduces Liz to a wheel of watching the trial, crying, doubting his guilt, drinking, watching the trial, crying etc, equally she's effectively stripped of what trivial agency she had in the commencement half.
Some other problem is that nosotros learn nothing new about Bundy himself; there'due south nothing almost his childhood, for example, or how he got away with the murders for so long, whether he really loved Liz, or if he genuinely lacked the power to feel empathy. Along the aforementioned lines, we learn zippo whatsoever well-nigh the victims. This was also a problem in the docu-series, simply it's far more than pronounced here, and because of this, the decision to put the names of his known victims on screen at the terminate of film is unearned, crass, and meaningless.
The film also makes some strange changes to documented fact, many of which seem designed to brand Bundy more sympathetic. For example, in that location's no mention of the fact that he tried multiple times to pressure level Liz into rough sex activity, particularly choking. Some other scene sees him forcibly restrained in his cell whilst a dentist takes impressions of his teeth. In reality, the impressions were taken in a dentist chair, and Bundy quite happily immune the dentist to work. The film too shows him continuing to try to contact Liz throughout his incarceration. In reality, nevertheless, he lost contact with her in the early 80s, and there'south no prove he tried to observe her.
Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile is by no means a bad film. But it could have been and so much improve. The shift from subjective focalisation to courtroom-room drama makes very little sense, and fundamentally undermines what Berlinger seems to have been trying to do. The film initially looks at how evil can hide in plain view, creeping into our lives nether the guise of normalcy, but Berlinger allows this theme to recede into the background as he hands the narrative over to Bundy. If this was supposed to be Liz's story, Berlinger takes his eye off the ball badly. And although the film certainly doesn't sympathise with Bundy, and although the decision not to testify any of the murders is commendable, the fact is that, still over again, Ted Bundy has get very much the star of his own testify.
45 out of sixty found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Zac nails it
People forget that Ted Bundy had a plea bargain for merely life in prison with no death penalty. He refused information technology at the concluding minute which shocked the approximate. I still like the 2002 Bundy film with Michael Reilly Burke who also did a great portrayal of Bundy. This is Zac's serious part for one time and shows he is a dandy actor unlike some of his poor comedies.
242 out of 317 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cracking acting
Alert: Spoilers
I was kind of disappointed in this movie. It did experience kind of dull. Like a reenactment of the trial that would be much more interesting to see equally a documentary. That said the interim of Zac Effron was perfect. He did a smashing job portraying Ted Bundy as a manipulator who charmed so many people despite the horrible things he did. He made it so well that when watching it and knowing who Ted Bundy is and how it ends I was noticing myself wanting him to win that trial and exist innocent. His performance is basically what made me give the flick an in a higher place average rating.
nine out of eleven establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What was the point?
This movie had such potential, simply failed to fulfill any of it. It'southward a real shame because the costumes, sets and locations were all fantastic. It was shot nicely. The soundtrack was okay, but could've been better I gauge. The acting was great. I think given improve material Zac Efron could've washed slap-up things with this role. He certainly looked the part and he did well with what he had; the problem is he didn't take a whole lot to work with. I retrieve the main issue is it lacked a clear focus. Whose story was it? It wasn't Liz'south, it wasn't Bundy's, it wasn't Carol Anne'south, it wasn't fifty-fifty whatever of the victim's stories. It just waffled on showing a few of the moments/facts we already knew. If you're going to give a movie a ridiculously long title like "Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil, and Vile" then you kind of need to show some wicked, evil, and vile acts at some point in the moving picture. Okay, and then I get that it'southward non considered adequate to glorify the crimes of serial killers. I hold with this, just yous certainly shouldn't endeavour to brand the audition sympathise with them while barely mentioning their numerous victims and the families of those victims. That list of names slapped on the end just before the credits made me cringe. Was that all the recognition these innocent victims deserved? For me, the thwarting comes down to the fact that this movie was nearly one of the near prolific killers of all fourth dimension and his crimes weren't depicted at all, nor were the stories of his victims. If you watched this movie, not knowing anything about Bundy, you certainly wouldn't leave it thinking about simply how terrible his "extremely wicked, shockingly evil, and vile" acts were. You wouldn't feel the immense loss he caused. I'm really not certain what yous'd have away from it. Mayhap you just exist dislocated every bit I was. Very poorly executed which I judge comes downward to a poor screenplay.
363 out of 533 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
People are missing the point
By now, people know almost Ted Bundy and what a monster he was. But people who are saying this film is boring, I believe they are missing the signal. It's not almost the Gorey details of his crimes, information technology'south about Bundy's relationship with people and how manipulative he was.
I am a true crime fan and have always considered myself "too smart to fall for such evil", but I have to admit, in that location were times when I establish myself rooting for Ted Bundy and then realized what I was doing. If you let yourself be fully submerged in the movie and toss out any expectations and what you think you know almost Ted Bundy, I think y'all will be pleasantly surprised at what yous are able to experience about someone who was a living nightmare. It made me realize why and so many women could have really fallen for Bundy's tricks.
ane,065 out of one,178 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Documentary is better
Alert: Spoilers
After seeing Joe Berlinger's incredible documentary and all the buzz around Zac Efron as Ted Bundy I was actually excited to see this movie. I was hoping it would shed some more light on why Bundy did what he did and how he got away with it, as well as all this thing with girls being in dear with him while he was on trial for murder. After realizing the movie was based on Liz Kendall's book about her time with Bundy I expected the movie to focus on their human relationship and how she institute out that something was wrong. Also in the documentary information technology is stated that she establish women's lingerie and other strange items in Bundy's appartment. Instead, the movie sort of mixes both storylines. The crimes are only very briefly shown, the fact that he kept some of his victims heads and belongings isn't mentioned and information technology seems more than about Bundy claiming his innocence. We all know he wasn't, so fifty-fifty though he did state he didn't practise it, giving it and so much time in the movie seems wrong. Overall this motion-picture show left me pretty unsatisfied. The casting of the moving picture is really skilful, I already knew Zac Efron could be Bundy'southward long lost Son or something, the resemblance is kind of scary, the costume design section, locations and camera work are very good, it is just the script and storytelling that actually put me off. If you want to savor Zac Efron in seventies clothing though, become scout.
157 out of 221 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A passive look at a killer
I am non certain I learnt more about Ted Bundy after this movie. He certainly was a charming suave and clever man. That was a facade, inside him was a cruel callous killer.
This movie starring Zac Efron as Bundy has a lot of tonal shifts. At times it is wacky as Bundy plans to escape from custody or argues against his own lawyer at trial. Then it could move to being chilling as the injuries of his murder victims are described. Then it moves to the footage of female fans who nourish his trial each day.
The story is based on the memoirs of Liz Kendall (Lily Collins.) She was the unmarried mum who had a long term relationship with Bundy when he was a immature law pupil. She as well gave his proper name to the police when his behaviour aroused suspicion.
The picture show does not want to glorify Bundy and be respectful to his victims. However I felt that the character of Kendall was banal. The motion-picture show really has to focus on Bundy. Efron gives a charming performance merely the script never gives him a chance to evidence a nighttime, brutal side of Bundy apart from just a glimpse at the terminate.
Ultimately in a scene stealing turn by John Malkovich as the trial judge, he describes Bundy as an intelligent man who could had used his talents to be a practiced lawyer; but information technology was not to be. The movie itself never gets a handle on how to tackle Bundy.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Zac was amazing
Alarm: Spoilers
Zac played Ted so well I most idea ted was innocent
313 out of 381 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Different Serial Killer Picture - In a Good Style
It is indeed quite on oddball amongst the serial killer movies, simply definitely not a bad one. Joe Berlinger's accept on Ted Bundy doesn't rely on graphic violence, killing/stalking action or any of the usual, horror-ish tropes, instead it poses every bit a courtroom-room & human relationship drama. While, for the kickoff half of the movie, it's hard to grasp the verbal tone of it, the second half has established a rather sad, uncompromising atmosphere - in a very expert fashion. The pacing is not slow, it'south quite engaging and has a smooth menses, at to the lowest degree for drama standards. Equally for the cinematography - it's crafty & careful, camera piece of work and editing is swift and dynamic. While all is skillful and decent, the main quality of the picture show is the acting - I was surprised by Zac Efron, whom I hadn't really seen in a serious role earlier. Task well done, Zac, job well done. The supporting bandage is as well remarkably great & John Malkovich is playing John Malkovich as always. The story is mostly centered on Ted Bundy's relationship with everyone but the victims, love life, his prison house time, media side of the whole thing & court happenings.
I have to say that, in my opinion, this particular movie about Ted Bundy does not serve much equally an introduction to the topic, it's more for those who already know who Theodore Robert Bundy is. I've seen some reviews bashing the movie for not having any on-screen deaths or the usual, anticipated serial killer motion-picture show action, so, be warned. This is a different kind of a series killer flick. My rating: viii/10
28 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vanilla motion picture about a murderer
Information technology was shame that the movie focused on the trial office and on that detail single mother only. This movie could've been something more thrilling and disturbingly eye communicable at the same time, as in good offense movie, but instead they chose safe and mediocre path. To be frank the trial part wasn't even that good either. It appears this movie is just almost mimicking the actual people who were involved in that moment. Which means it didn't accept to be a movie. Documentary version would've been much improve. When flick loses to documentary, it simply means information technology was boring.
73 out of 125 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Accurate portrayal of the 70s merely with a 2019 attention bridge
Warning: Spoilers
The movie is extremely disjointed and seems to be a series of prepare pieces versus a coherent story line where we slowly realize the depth of Bundy's depravity. Yeah, nosotros know in real life Bundy was a charming psychopath only it would have been more than enjoyable to watch him slowly unveil himself equally the monster he was. Nosotros know pretty much at the first that he is a ii-faced psycho with cops and detectives hot on his trail from the kickoff sequence. The cinematography and sets capture the look of the 70s simply the pace is too frenetic with besides many jump cuts and pseudo cinéma vérité photographic camera work. The entire atmosphere is strangely cheery with upbeat 70s pop music in light of the night and heavy material. Bundy's ability to amuse his actual victims isn't really given much exposure versus his immediate family and the legal system which he manipulated. Zac Efron, who bears more than a passing resemblance to Bundy, gives a decent performance and was a good casting option. The courtroom scenes that make upward the 3rd act are where the film finally finds it'southward feet. If you are familiar with the bodily example, y'all may exist disappointed with how the plot unfolds. If not, you lot should come away with a better understanding of the case only with picayune knowledge of his many victims. Recommended with these caveats.
92 out of 131 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A moving picture that makes you sick from the inside
This film tells the notorious serial killer in the Usa.
The story concentrates on his life outside the murders, so there are non scenes that are gory or agonizing. Withal, the film successfully makes yous sick from the within. The performances are corking, and I nonetheless feel nauseated from the pure evil that is tangentially portrayed.
6 out of 8 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The wolf in a sheep's clothing
Warning: Spoilers
The point of the movie, which many seem to miss, is that you lot are supposed to be taken in past Ted Bundy's charm. It is showing you why and so many brutal victim to his charm. While watching, it is hard to belive that this is non an innocent man about to be convicted of terrible crimes. He is charming, has a long-term girlfriend (fiancé in the end) and a pace-daughter. He lives a family life and shower them with affections. He is, on the surface, the perfect boyfriend.
Nevertheless, underneath i of the most wicked and evil serial killers of all time. He is merciless, savage, and consequent in the type of victim he chooses. He is manipulating and intelligent, he is a man venus trap. The motion picture is trying to show how people rarely looks similar monsters hiding in the dark. Information technology could exist anyone and only the occasional red flag appears. It makes you reevaluate homo nature and the depth that could hide within a person.
The performances in this film are fabulous and it is a movie worth watching. Don't expect the usual series killer type where yous are led to realize what a terrible person they are through their crimes. It is a picture that makes you realize the terror of charming looks and intelligence coupled with a thirst for killing.
106 out of 139 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star studded and fascinating
Fifty-fifty if you think you have seen enough about Ted Bundy on TV this turned out to be fascinating from beginning to end. Lily Collins every bit his girlfriend acts well from beautiful and in love to depressed and devastated. Kaya acts well every bit Carole the insanely devoted next girlfriend who supports and believes in him totally. Zac Efron does a proficient task and gives a charismatic functioning without glamorizing the monster. Big stars in supporting roles like Jim Parsons every bit a prosecutor and John Malkovich as a judge. At first things are shown from the POV of the dearest of his life. Later it'southward a fascinating look at his 2 escapes and trial.
Worth a watch.
4 out of 5 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Throw Out Your Preconcieved Notions
Warning: Spoilers
It seems there'due south a real mixed bag of responses to this film, and many of them not and then skilful. However I thought the movie was actually pretty interesting. If yous go into it expecting a tense or gruesome thriller based on the well known killer, it's no wonder yous may end the picture show being disappointed. It really isn't that type of picture show. It'south more of an exploratory movie that attempts to look into the mind of Ted, and his fiancé once the law closes in on him. In this respect, I found this project to really be a adequately unique and worthy quest.
Say what you lot will, simply to me this was an interesting view on the truthful crime events of Bundy. Here in this portrayal, and you lot do too see information technology in real Bundy interview footage likewise, it seems that Ted entirely disassociates himself from the crimes in his listen, and from the person who did the crimes. As if he has a totally 'Other' side within himself. Obviously a series killer must compartmentalize themselves to a certain degree, especially if they are to keep carrying on relationships in society that hide their darker side. For Ted this was certainly part of his aim. Many believe that Ted maintained his innocence for so long mainly because it gave him some form of control, which was in a way his obsession. The pic focuses on this manipulative aspect, and in my view, quite successfully. I recollect his day to solar day manipulative behaviour was overall captured and written much better for the Television receiver motion-picture show, The Deliberate Stranger. Nonetheless this moving picture is withal quite interesting in it's own right.
To be honest, I never totally believed that his long time girlfriend with the daughter, had such a hard time believing it was him that did the murders. It'south hard to believe that anyone would practise the things Ted did, sure, in that way I understand her disbelief. However in reality, contrary to this moving picture, she actually reported Ted to the police force three different times. So to me, that says her suspicions were pretty firm. Truthfully, this film ignores a lot of facts, just to me it'southward yet worth a watch or two.
I've never been much of an Efron guy from what I've seen in the past. Though I must admit, hither he does a very proficient job. Strong operation, pretty potent film. Lily Collins however is pretty much always a pleasure to sentinel. Her performance hither was nothing brusk of excellent. I believe I as well noticed that "I meet dead people" child in the movie. Don't allow whatsoever of this push or pull yous. If yous're interested in information technology, watch information technology, but I recommend going into this film, and in fact all films without any expectations. As the Buddha is often credited with maxim, "Call back less, observe more.". seven/10
3 out of three plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Also superficial
First the practiced. Solid work from the actors, particularly Efron, Parsons and Milkovich. The costuming and set pattern was spot on, especially the Miami court room.
At present the not so expert, in that location is merely too much to unpack with Ted Bundy to cover in 110 minutes. The pic has to gloss over then much material to fit fourth dimension constraints. We only mildly run into Bundy'southward manipulative skills. We never see the psychopathy. Without more particular and more insight into the crimes, the flick is really merely flabby and flaccid.
To me, this movie would take been better served as a mini series and then we could come across the beginnings and development of Bundy and his relationships.
145 out of 205 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Extremely Weak, Shockingly Stupid and Idiotic.
Let me commencement by saying I knew from the opening minutes of the moving picture what they were trying to do, what kind of story they were trying to tell. Simply I as well knew from the very same moment they were probably going to fail miserably at it, and they did.
This is the story of a single mother, who refuses to believe the beloved of her life, the man that was there when she needed him could potentially be a serial killer. This is not a bad plot, and it could have actually worked if her perfect boyfriend was not Ted Bundy. And I realize that the story is told from her perspective, but there is no pause of disbelief when it comes to one of America's more prolific serial killers.
The picture as well tries its all-time to brand the audience run across Bundy from her eyes, but it no easy task for the reasons I have already mentioned. This formula has worked before in other movies, but it did not work in this one, and I call up that casting Zac Efron in it was a fault, considering thou he is charming, he cannot human action to relieve his life, he tries to fool the audience with his charisma but the audition is non that stupid nor are they naive.
If this had been a flick that told or fifty-fifty showed his crimes it might have given resonance to what Ted Bundy's case highlighted, that the evil doers are non hiding in shadows, but they walk amidst us in wide day lite. Still this film wanted the audience to sympathise with Bundy and his extremely naïve girlfriend, and information technology failed astoundingly at that.
I rate this mess a 4/10. It had a great supporting cast, and it was filmed well in a technical level. But story wise it was extremely weak, shockingly stupid and idiotic.
7 out of 10 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Extremely Vile Exploitation
Ted would have loved this picture. Over again, he is the star and center of attention. Not just is Ted played by heartthrob Zac Efron, but he as well gets almost two hours of screen time to manipulate usa so we feel distressing for him. What more could a sociopath enquire for?
Meanwhile, the women that he murdered are treated as a simple plot device. We acquire nothing about who they were, and what they might have become. Their names are on screen for thirty seconds at the end of the movie. A token gesture, afterward their deaths accept been exploited and their killer humanized.
Ted was extremely wicked, but you would never know information technology past the sympathetic, mannerly, and tragic portrayal he receives in this movie. Go read the bodily details almost his crimes, and you will concur he was pure evil and amend off forgotten.
24 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Elementary Review
My married woman and I plant this film very boring theres no flow to the movie what then ever.
Zac Efron in fairness looked a lot like Ted Bundy just that's the only positive regarding the movie.
Avoid
28 out of 50 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A story of this nature deserves ameliorate!!!!!
This is such a thwarting and a bummer for multiple reasons, that if were meliorate, could accept elevated this picture show so much more to the level that this story deserves and needs. This sort of story has award flavour written all over it, all the same certain key decisions accept led to it ending up the manner it did, so much potential for a great film.
What's more shocking is the fact that this picture is directed by Joe Berlinger, the same man who created, directed and wrote the documentary mini-series " Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bunny Tapes". Which is a fantastic mini-series that was released earlier in the twelvemonth, showing an intimate await at Ted Bunny himself through recordings of his whilst he was in prison house in Florida. Its only 4 episodes long merely it is extremely fascinating and a wonderfully put together evidence that I tin't highly recommend enough.
However this is what I cant sympathise, why, Joe Berlinger idea he needed to brand a film about Ted Bunny besides?? Especially because I cant become my caput around the fact that the mini-series and this picture show were made by the same person........They are miles autonomously in terms of quality!!!
Lets showtime of with the best positives I can give the film.....erm.........its non the worst thing in the world, its watchable however not very memorable. The directing from Berlinger is fine throughout and has got a solid-ish story behind his film. The cast for the about part are fine they practice nothing incorrect, still once again they don't do much right. Lily Collins was good in her role and I would say she is the best part of the moving picture and the more interesting story to follow, which is worrying, but she definitely shows an arc to her character over the years. Interested every bit to see what she does adjacent.
Now instead of just bashing a film and spouting hate, I'll endeavor to make my points clear and fair as to why I really didn't similar the film. Firstly and probably the biggest elephant in the room..........Zac Efron. Now I have no view on Efron as an histrion, I volition admit I oasis't seen much of his work, unfortunately this doesn't make me want to search it out. Let me get this direct I don't think Zac Efron was terrible, I actually call back he did the best he could with what he had. However I think he was miss cast completely!! Now I know this term is bonded around a lot and can see very elite-ist, but a more seasoned/method role player would have been much better. Someone of the level of a "Christian Bale" not him specifically just someone of that nature could have really delve in deep and transformed into Bundy. For me Efron was just playing himself.
The other large problem is the story......its a petty all over the place as skips sure moments in time, its as if the film itself doesn't really know what its narrative is or what its focusing on. Unfortunately it doesn't focus on the murders specifically, there sort of in the background. Instead it tries to focus on the relationship the of Ted and Liz......which......erm.......is quite irksome. The films tries to cram in as much every bit it tin can without actually total realising or developing one story line to a fitting conclusion.
Overall its 45% out of 100 or 4.5 out of ten, its just non that skilful....its fine perhaps a moving picture to put on in the background. However this pic had such potential to be a cracking picture show, with a better director, amend atomic number 82 thespian and a more compelling narrative that covers all the bases. With that it could have been to a meliorate standard and perhaps fifty-fifty Oscar gold. Its fifty-fifty more surprising and shocking considering how adept the mini-series was from Joe Berlinger, such a shame!
P.Due south - For me someone like David Fincher would have been more appropriate to direct. Also just crusade you expect like someone doesn't hateful you can portray them on film, Efron a picayune out of his depth.
22 out of 41 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A masterful motion-picture show that I did non run into coming
Earlier watching 'Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile' I knew of Ted Bundy, only I didn't know any details or really accept any information or noesis about his crimes or him every bit a person. I would advise that the more you lot know about him, the less y'all volition enjoy this film. Or at least you will have to enjoy it on a different level. For me this picture show did something I didn't expect it to do - information technology fabricated me almost like Bundy. And it likewise (at least from the point of view the picture was coming from) fabricated me question his guilt for a big role of the runtime. This was a quite masterfully put together film.
Firstly, the performances are outstanding across the lath. This is the best performance I have ever seen from Zac Efron. As a comedic thespian he does very piffling for me, withal this film was proof that as a serious actor he can carry a film entirely on his own. Besides Lily Collins impressed me immensely once again. She had already blown me abroad in 'To the Os', and again here (admittedly I didn't really recognise her due to the normal weight she had in this film) she was captivating to picket every time she was on screen. The final scene these two share together is some acting of the highest quality.
This is non a moving-picture show that is trying to shock you with grisly murders and over the top characters. It is something very different to that indeed. In fact in terms of activity at that place is most none, nevertheless the 110 minute runtime flies by. The pacing is exquisite, mostly considering the dialogue is and so well written. I'll be honest, this pic caught me off guard past how adept it was. If you're on the border near seeing it, please do. You'll be very happy you did.
ii out of two institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2481498/reviews
Post a Comment for "Plugged in Movie Reviews Extremely Wicked Shockingly Evil"